
Dane examines the discount on Centuria Office REIT, the risks behind reported property valuations, and whether improving fundamentals could point to a counter-cyclical opportunity.
An area many investors are avoiding
I've been revisiting an area of the Australian property market that most investors seem quite happy to avoid.
Office buildings.
More specifically, the enormous discounts some ASX-listed office property trusts are trading at relative to their reported net tangible assets.
Take Centuria Office REIT (ASX: COF).
Its most recently reported NTA was $1.66 per unit. On 13 October, the market price was around 85 cents.
That's a discount of almost 49%.
A discount does not automatically mean cheap
Now, I wouldn't suggest for a moment that this automatically makes it cheap.
Property valuations can be wrong. Office buildings require ongoing capital expenditure.
Tenants have choices, financing costs matter, and debt can magnify the consequences when things don't go according to plan.
But I wanted to understand how unusual this discount really is.
So I've been going back through the history of Australian listed office trusts, including Commonwealth Property Office Fund, Investa Office Fund and Charter Hall Office REIT, with records extending into the 1990s.
What becomes clear is that the listed market and underlying property valuations don't always move together.
And sometimes the sharemarket adjusts well ahead of the physical property market. That's what makes the current situation interesting.
Could office property be counter-cyclical?
COF has reported improving leasing activity, some positive property revaluations and the sale of an office building above its book valuation.
Yet its units are trading at a substantial discount to reported NTA.
My broader thinking about property remains heavily influenced by the long-term property and credit cycle research of Property Sharemarket Economics. I still see reasons to be cautious about the broader cycle.
But could office property be experiencing its own counter-cyclical opportunity within that bigger picture?
Possibly.
The downturn has been going on for roughly four years, although the historical evidence doesn't yet establish that four years is some reliable turning point.
The question I am researching
For me, the interesting question isn't simply whether the discount is large.
It's whether the underlying fundamentals are beginning to improve while the listed market is still pricing in a much worse outcome.
That's the question I'm researching.
General market commentary only, not personal financial advice.
This is general information, not advice tailored to you. Your circumstances matter; speak with an authorised adviser before making a financial decision.
WARNING: General advice only. Readers are advised to discuss, with an Authorised Representative, the appropriateness of each recommendation, together with the general and specific risks of investing having regard to personal needs, objectives and financial circumstances. OF Planning Pty Ltd ABN 42670586400 trading as Life First Advice. Dane Pymble (AR323636) is an Authorised Representative of PGW Financial Services Pty Ltd (AFSL 384713 ABN15 123 835 441). All Rights Reserved.
Other perspectives
Australian property and the risk beneath the cycle
A comparison with US property history is not a crash forecast. It is a prompt to consider valuation, leverage, employment and liquidity together.
Read the perspective 02 / Further readingProperty & MarketsCan property prices keep rising faster than incomes?
Housing affordability is a real problem. But price-to-income ratios alone are not a reliable forecast of what land prices must do next.
Read the perspective